<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jeff Macfee &#187; Movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macfee.net/category/movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macfee.net</link>
	<description>It Will All Work Out in the End</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jumper&#8230;.oh the humanity</title>
		<link>http://macfee.net/2008/02/15/jumperoh-the-humanity/</link>
		<comments>http://macfee.net/2008/02/15/jumperoh-the-humanity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macfee.net/2008/02/15/jumperoh-the-humanity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. What a mess. Jumper. Either I&#8217;m carsick or that movie was really bad. Maybe both. I haven&#8217;t assimilated the true badness yet. I&#8217;ve never had a proctology exam, but I imagine it&#8217;s something like what I just experienced. How&#8217;s that for graphic? If nothing else, the teaser for Indy IV rocked. Technorati Tags: movies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  What a mess.  Jumper.  Either I&#8217;m carsick or that movie was really bad.  Maybe both.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t assimilated the true badness yet.  I&#8217;ve never had a proctology exam, but I imagine it&#8217;s something like what I just experienced.  How&#8217;s that for graphic?</p>
<p>If nothing else, the <a href="http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/indianajones.html?showVideo=1">teaser for Indy IV</a> rocked.<br />
<!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/movies" rel="tag">movies</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macfee.net/2008/02/15/jumperoh-the-humanity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snap judgement I&#8217;ll regret later</title>
		<link>http://macfee.net/2008/01/18/snap-judgement-ill-regret-later/</link>
		<comments>http://macfee.net/2008/01/18/snap-judgement-ill-regret-later/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macfee.net/2008/01/18/snap-judgement-ill-regret-later/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And another thing about Cloverfield reviews, specifically the complaint about the main characters being &#8220;yuppies&#8221;, and wouldn&#8217;t it have made a better movie to show &#8220;real&#8221; people. The cynical side of me says the movie reviewers are forced-ennui bohemian types who resent yuppies anyway, even when they are being eaten by monsters. I guess they&#8217;d [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And another thing about <em>Cloverfield</em> reviews, specifically the complaint about the main characters being &#8220;yuppies&#8221;, and wouldn&#8217;t it have made a better movie to show &#8220;real&#8221; people.  The cynical side of me says the movie reviewers are forced-ennui bohemian types who resent yuppies anyway, even when they are being eaten by monsters.  I guess they&#8217;d rather see their fellow indie-rock coffeehouse brethren masticated by a large Lovecraftian behometh?</p>
<p>With friends like that&#8230;</p>
<p><!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/cloverfield" rel="tag">cloverfield</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/movies" rel="tag">movies</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macfee.net/2008/01/18/snap-judgement-ill-regret-later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cloverfield &#8211; awesome</title>
		<link>http://macfee.net/2008/01/18/cloverfield-awesome/</link>
		<comments>http://macfee.net/2008/01/18/cloverfield-awesome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macfee.net/2008/01/18/cloverfield-awesome/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just saw Cloverfield, and it was better than I though it would be. Intense, thought the characters were true to the setting and the situations, really well done. Some reviews called out the &#8220;vapid and shallow twenty-something characters&#8221;. Well&#8230;it&#8217;s NYC, and the characters are supposed to be in their twenties. I&#8217;d say vapid and shallow [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw <em>Cloverfield</em>, and it was better than I though it would be.  Intense, thought the characters were true to the setting and the situations, really well done.  Some reviews called out the &#8220;vapid and shallow twenty-something characters&#8221;.  Well&#8230;it&#8217;s NYC, and the characters are supposed to be in their twenties.  I&#8217;d say vapid and shallow is the norm.  Hell, I was in my thirties when I lived in New York, and I was fairly vapid and shallow.  So there you go.</p>
<p>Other viewers felt it capitalized on the horrors and phobias we carry over from 9/11.  Well, I did think of 9/11 once or twice.  But come on &#8212; we&#8217;re going to let terrorists dictate movie content now?  It&#8217;s a movie.  We can&#8217;t knock down buildings in movies any more?  I didn&#8217;t feel <em>Cloverfield</em> tried to exploit this connection in any way.  Your opinion may vary, but then, it&#8217;s your opinion and not mine.</p>
<p>And the length is just right.  Runs something like 88/89 minutes.  Perfect for the all action/hand-held approach they used.  I&#8217;d say more, but I don&#8217;t want to dole out spoilers.</p>
<p>Anyway, if you&#8217;re an action movie junkie, I recommend it.</p>
<p><!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/movies" rel="tag">movies</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/cloverfield" rel="tag">cloverfield</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macfee.net/2008/01/18/cloverfield-awesome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Branching out into other areas where I lack skill &#8211; movie reviews</title>
		<link>http://macfee.net/2007/12/14/branching-out-into-other-areas-where-i-lack-skill-movie-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://macfee.net/2007/12/14/branching-out-into-other-areas-where-i-lack-skill-movie-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 03:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macfee.net/2007/12/14/branching-out-into-other-areas-where-i-lack-skill-movie-reviews/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just saw &#8220;I am Legend&#8221; No &#8212; it&#8217;s not the book, but the movie is never the book. It&#8217;s never bothered me as a read/movie goer, and I suspect it won&#8217;t bother should I ever win the life lotto and publish a book that is turned into a film. This was a great action movie [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw &#8220;I am Legend&#8221;  No &#8212; it&#8217;s not the book, but the movie is never the book.  It&#8217;s never bothered me as a read/movie goer, and I suspect it won&#8217;t bother should I ever win the life lotto and publish a book that is turned into a film.  This was a great action movie with some real thought given to character and a relatively consistent movie logic.  And Wil Smith is just likeable, what can you say.</p>
<p>Were there issues?  Of course, a few, but hell, my own books will always have issues.  I&#8217;m not quite sure why Hollywood is so afraid of the book as is.  Seems to me it would translate well to the screen, ending and all.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to throw stones here.  I expected good, and it was even better than that.  Definitely worth your kopecs.</p>
<p><!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/movies" rel="tag">movies</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/willsmith" rel="tag">willsmith</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macfee.net/2007/12/14/branching-out-into-other-areas-where-i-lack-skill-movie-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
